Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2.9 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2.9 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
800f82
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
18/36
8/16
TDP
165 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
431.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-10980XE
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
4.25k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
19.72k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
5.84k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.64k
21.36k (x2.22)
TOTAL
37.6k
51.17k (x1.36)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
84.93k
35.04k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
409.55k
181.42k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.88k
64.86k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.12k
8.21k (x0.37)
TOTAL
639.48k
289.54k (x0.45)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
15.22k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
23.95k
24.12k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.03k
5.87k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.37k
21k (x2.24)
TOTAL
55.38k
66.21k (x1.2)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
316.11k
126.81k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
503.75k
229.86k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
131.82k
61.74k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.24k
9.77k (x0.44)
TOTAL
973.92k
428.19k (x0.44)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
14.44k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
24.92k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
5.8k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
19.07k (x2.15)
TOTAL
52.05k
64.24k (x1.23)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
122.01k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
220.34k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
59.89k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
9.9k (x0.45)
TOTAL
929.85k
412.13k (x0.44)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
15.34k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
25.75k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
5.79k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
17.95k (x1.76)
TOTAL
68.33k
64.83k (x0.95)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
123.07k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
239.3k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
60.6k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
8.18k (x0.36)
TOTAL
1241.12k
431.14k (x0.35)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4