Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen 5 3600X
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3600X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 3.3 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 3.3 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
870f10
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Matisse
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
18/36
6/12
TDP
165 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
November 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
69.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
376.22k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
16.21k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
22.99k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
8.76k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
21.94k (x2.15)
TOTAL
68.33k
69.9k (x1.02)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
121.94k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
153.22k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
67.74k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
33.31k (x1.45)
TOTAL
1241.12k
376.22k (x0.3)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
1613 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
351 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
3960 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
3685 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5225 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
4986 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
15887 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4