Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.1 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.1 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
800f82
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
18/36
6/12
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
November 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
303.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
14.08k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
22.56k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
5.19k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
16.71k (x1.64)
TOTAL
68.33k
58.53k (x0.86)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
86.62k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
168.1k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
43.51k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
5.16k (x0.22)
TOTAL
1241.12k
303.4k (x0.24)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
4668 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4