Core i9-10980XE vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 7.4 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 7.4 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
810f81
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
18/36
4/4
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
168.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-10980XE
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
3.89k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
17.94k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
5.34k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.64k
6.62k (x0.69)
TOTAL
37.6k
33.79k (x0.9)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
84.93k
15.07k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
409.55k
66.84k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.88k
19.56k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.12k
6.54k (x0.3)
TOTAL
639.48k
108.01k (x0.17)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.03k
14.3k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
23.95k
21.69k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.03k
5.42k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.37k
6.6k (x0.7)
TOTAL
55.38k
48k (x0.87)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
316.11k
55.45k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
503.75k
83.13k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
131.82k
20.76k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.24k
6.58k (x0.3)
TOTAL
973.92k
165.91k (x0.17)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.4k
13.05k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
20.97k
22.88k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.82k
5.39k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.86k
7.31k (x0.83)
TOTAL
52.05k
48.63k (x0.93)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
316.84k
51.73k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
461.09k
87.74k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
129.82k
20.74k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.09k
6.57k (x0.3)
TOTAL
929.85k
166.79k (x0.18)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
14.48k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
23.84k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
5.43k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
5.46k (x0.53)
TOTAL
68.33k
49.21k (x0.72)
Multithread
i9-10980XE
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
54.39k (x0.09)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
88.77k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
20.04k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
5.48k (x0.24)
TOTAL
1241.12k
168.69k (x0.14)
Performance/W
i9-10980XE
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4