| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs i9-12900K


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i9-12900K is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i9-12900K gets 1131.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 1.1 times faster than the i9-12900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
90672
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Alder Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
18/36
16/24
TDP
165 W
241 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
30720 kB
Date
November 2019
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
109.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
1131.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
47.92k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
30.1k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
15.65k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
15.38k (x1.51)
TOTAL
68.33k
109.05k (x1.6)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
502.11k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
414.67k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
192.52k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
22.3k (x0.97)
TOTAL
1241.12k
1131.59k (x0.91)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
2083 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
1721 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
799 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
4695 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
9216 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5789 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
3009 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
2957 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
20971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4