| | | | | | |

Core i9-10980XE vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10980XE gets a score of 1241.1 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 5.2 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806c2
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
18/36
4/8
TDP
165 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
18x32+18x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
18x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
25344 kB
12288 kB
Date
November 2019
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.33k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
1241.12k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.52k
4.57k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
17.21k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.5k
9.97k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.64k
14.98k (x1.55)
TOTAL
37.6k
46.75k (x1.24)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
84.93k
12.75k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
409.55k
45.98k (x0.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122.88k
27.86k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.12k
20.06k (x0.91)
TOTAL
639.48k
106.66k (x0.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10980XE
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
29.53k
30.89k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
22.59k
25.57k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.99k
10.64k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.22k
15.66k (x1.53)
TOTAL
68.33k
82.77k (x1.21)

Multithread

i9-10980XE

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
587.06k
96.34k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
496.41k
95.75k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
134.66k
32.29k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.99k
15.2k (x0.66)
TOTAL
1241.12k
239.58k (x0.19)

Performance/W
i9-10980XE
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3558 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3009 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
816 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
7522 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10980XE
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6153 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4707 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2129 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
14236 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4