| | | | | | |

Core i9-10940X vs i7-1065G7


Description
The i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10940X gets a score of 1088.1 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 5.1 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
706e5
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
14/28
4/8
TDP
165 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
14x1024 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
72.04k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
1088.11k points
214.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10940X
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
29.75k
28.19k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
27.44k
22.13k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
10.32k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
14.17k (x1.57)
TOTAL
72.04k
74.82k (x1.04)

Multithread

i9-10940X

i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
485.37k
86.39k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
472.7k
86.22k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.09k
32.99k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.95k
8.75k (x0.52)
TOTAL
1088.11k
214.34k (x0.2)

Performance/W
i9-10940X
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2865 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
685 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
6595 points/W
14289 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10940X
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6197 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5717 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1210 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1885 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
15009 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4