Core i9-10940X vs Ryzen 7 3800X
Description
The i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10940X gets a score of 1088.1 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 2.2 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10940X gets a score of 1088.1 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 2.2 times faster than the 3800X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
870f10
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
14/28
8/16
TDP
165 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
14x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
32768 kB
Date
November 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
72.04k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
1088.11k points
497.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10940X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.75k
17.1k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
27.44k
26.59k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
8.91k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
23.21k (x2.57)
TOTAL
72.04k
75.81k (x1.05)
Multithread
i9-10940X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
485.37k
172.04k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
472.7k
214.03k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.09k
97.1k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.95k
14.57k (x0.86)
TOTAL
1088.11k
497.74k (x0.46)
Performance/W
i9-10940X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2865 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
685 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
6595 points/W
4740 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10940X
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6197 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5717 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1210 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1885 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
15009 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4