Core i9-10940X vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10940X gets a score of 1088.1 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 3.1 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10940X gets a score of 1088.1 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 3.1 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
870f10
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
14/28
6/12
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
14x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
32768 kB
Date
November 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
72.04k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
1088.11k points
348.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10940X
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
29.75k
16.04k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
27.44k
24.47k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
8.38k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
21.66k (x2.39)
TOTAL
72.04k
70.55k (x0.98)
Multithread
i9-10940X
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
485.37k
113.63k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
472.7k
143.55k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.09k
63.84k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.95k
27.34k (x1.61)
TOTAL
1088.11k
348.35k (x0.32)
Performance/W
i9-10940X
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2865 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
685 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
6595 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10940X
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6197 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5717 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1210 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1885 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
15009 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4