| | | | | | |

Core i9-10940X vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10940X gets a score of 1088.1 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 4.5 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806c2
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
14/28
4/8
TDP
165 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
14x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
12288 kB
Date
November 2019
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
72.04k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
1088.11k points
239.58k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10940X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
29.75k
30.89k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
27.44k
25.57k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
10.64k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
15.66k (x1.73)
TOTAL
72.04k
82.77k (x1.15)

Multithread

i9-10940X

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
485.37k
96.34k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
472.7k
95.75k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.09k
32.29k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.95k
15.2k (x0.9)
TOTAL
1088.11k
239.58k (x0.22)

Performance/W
i9-10940X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2865 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
685 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
6595 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10940X
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6197 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5717 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1210 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1885 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
15009 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4