| | | | | | |

Core i9-10940X vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10940X gets a score of 1088.1 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 5.2 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806c1
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
14/28
4/8
TDP
165 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
14x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
12288 kB
Date
November 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
72.04k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
1088.11k points
210.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10940X
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
29.75k
22.97k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
27.44k
21.61k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
8.99k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
8.52k (x0.94)
TOTAL
72.04k
62.1k (x0.86)

Multithread

i9-10940X

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
485.37k
82.75k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
472.7k
86.58k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.09k
29.34k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.95k
11.72k (x0.69)
TOTAL
1088.11k
210.4k (x0.19)

Performance/W
i9-10940X
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2865 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
685 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
6595 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10940X
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6197 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5717 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1210 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1885 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
15009 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4