Core i9-10900X vs i5-8300H
Description
The i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 3.5 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 3.5 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
906ea
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
10/20
4/8
TDP
165 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
10x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
62.28k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
632.35k points
182.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900X
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.97k
23.6k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.37k
21.72k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.3k
4.61k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
6.8k (x0.79)
TOTAL
62.28k
56.72k (x0.91)
Multithread
i9-10900X
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
281.98k
79.12k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
259.01k
81.27k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.87k
17.46k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.5k
4.62k (x0.17)
TOTAL
632.35k
182.47k (x0.29)
Performance/W
i9-10900X
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1709 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
161 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
3832 points/W
4055 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900X
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5526 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4760 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1128 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1835 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
13250 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4