| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900X vs i3-10110U


Description
The i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 5.9 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806ec
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
10/20
2/4
TDP
165 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
10x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.28k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
632.35k points
106.58k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.97k
24.6k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
22.37k
22.32k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.3k
5.02k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
4.7k (x0.54)
TOTAL
62.28k
56.64k (x0.91)

Multithread

i9-10900X

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
281.98k
47.98k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
259.01k
44.28k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.87k
10.33k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.5k
3.98k (x0.15)
TOTAL
632.35k
106.58k (x0.17)

Performance/W
i9-10900X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1709 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
161 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
3832 points/W
7105 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
5526 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4760 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1128 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1835 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
13250 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4