Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.8 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1.8 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
870f10
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/20
6/12
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
10x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
32768 kB
Date
November 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
62.28k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
632.35k points
348.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900X
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.97k
16.04k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
22.37k
24.47k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.3k
8.38k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
21.66k (x2.51)
TOTAL
62.28k
70.55k (x1.13)
Multithread
i9-10900X
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
281.98k
113.63k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
259.01k
143.55k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.87k
63.84k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.5k
27.34k (x1.03)
TOTAL
632.35k
348.35k (x0.55)
Performance/W
i9-10900X
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1709 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
161 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3832 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900X
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5526 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4760 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1128 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1835 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
13250 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4