Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 2.1 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 2.1 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
800f82
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/20
6/12
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
10x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
November 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
62.28k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
632.35k points
303.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.97k
14.08k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
22.37k
22.56k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.3k
5.19k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
16.71k (x1.94)
TOTAL
62.28k
58.53k (x0.94)
Multithread
i9-10900X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
281.98k
86.62k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
259.01k
168.1k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.87k
43.51k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.5k
5.16k (x0.19)
TOTAL
632.35k
303.4k (x0.48)
Performance/W
i9-10900X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1709 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
161 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
3832 points/W
4668 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5526 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4760 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1128 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1835 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
13250 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4