Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 2.3 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 2.3 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
800f11
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/20
6/12
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
10x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
November 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
62.28k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
632.35k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
25.97k
13.67k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
22.37k
22.28k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.3k
4.99k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
15.22k (x1.76)
TOTAL
62.28k
56.16k (x0.9)
Multithread
i9-10900X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
281.98k
81.03k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
259.01k
145.84k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.87k
39.14k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.5k
6.79k (x0.26)
TOTAL
632.35k
272.8k (x0.43)
Performance/W
i9-10900X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1709 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
161 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
3832 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
5526 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4760 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1128 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1835 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
13250 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4