| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900X vs i7-11800H


Description
The i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the i7-11800H gets 607.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 1 times faster than the i7-11800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806d1
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/16
TDP
165 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
10x1024 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
24576 kB
Date
November 2019
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.28k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
632.35k points
607.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900X
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.97k
33.02k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
22.37k
26.55k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.3k
11.72k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
17.06k (x1.98)
TOTAL
62.28k
88.34k (x1.42)

Multithread

i9-10900X

i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
281.98k
260.97k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
259.01k
248.94k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.87k
86.55k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.5k
10.91k (x0.41)
TOTAL
632.35k
607.38k (x0.96)

Performance/W
i9-10900X
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1709 points/W
5799 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/W
5532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
1923 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
161 points/W
242 points/W
TOTAL
3832 points/W
13497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900X
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5526 points/GHz
7177 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4760 points/GHz
5771 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1128 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1835 points/GHz
3709 points/GHz
TOTAL
13250 points/GHz
19204 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4