| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900X vs i5-11300H


Description
The i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 2.2 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806c1
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Tiger Lake H35
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
10/20
4/8
TDP
165 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
10x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
62.28k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
632.35k points
285.75k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900X
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.97k
25.83k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
22.37k
23.56k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.3k
9.2k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
5.06k (x0.59)
TOTAL
62.28k
63.64k (x1.02)

Multithread

i9-10900X

i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
281.98k
116.87k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
259.01k
121.08k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.87k
41.8k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.5k
6k (x0.23)
TOTAL
632.35k
285.75k (x0.45)

Performance/W
i9-10900X
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1709 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
161 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
3832 points/W
8164 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900X
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5526 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4760 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1128 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1835 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
13250 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4