| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900X vs i3-1115G4


Description
The i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900X gets a score of 632.4 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 4.6 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806c1
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
10/20
2/4
TDP
165 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
10x1024 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
62.28k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
632.35k points
137.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900X
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
25.97k
24.25k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
22.37k
21.63k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.3k
9.09k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
7.23k (x0.84)
TOTAL
62.28k
62.19k (x1)

Multithread

i9-10900X

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
281.98k
56.9k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
259.01k
55.68k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.87k
19.29k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.5k
6.09k (x0.23)
TOTAL
632.35k
137.96k (x0.22)

Performance/W
i9-10900X
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1709 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
393 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
161 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
3832 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900X
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5526 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4760 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1128 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1835 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
13250 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4