Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 5800H
Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.9 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.9 times faster than the 5800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Cezanne
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/16
TDP
125 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
426.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
20.37k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
22.52k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
10.18k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
21.49k (x1.37)
TOTAL
90.37k
74.56k (x0.83)
Multithread
i9-10900KF
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
144.01k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
191.86k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
84.53k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
6.5k (x0.53)
TOTAL
825.47k
426.9k (x0.52)
Performance/W
i9-10900KF
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
9487 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4