| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 7 4800HS


Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.9 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-S
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/16
TDP
125 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
61.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
427.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
16.66k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
26.01k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
9.31k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
9.15k (x0.58)
TOTAL
90.37k
61.12k (x0.68)

Multithread

i9-10900KF

4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
144.48k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
192.46k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
83.17k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
7.51k (x0.61)
TOTAL
825.47k
427.61k (x0.52)

Performance/W
i9-10900KF
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
12218 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4