Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 4.8 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 4.8 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
10/20
6/12
TDP
125 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
173.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
14.63k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
24.09k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
5.51k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
15.86k (x1.01)
TOTAL
90.37k
60.09k (x0.66)
Multithread
i9-10900KF
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
48.75k (x0.13)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
80.1k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
24.5k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
19.85k (x1.62)
TOTAL
825.47k
173.2k (x0.21)
Performance/W
i9-10900KF
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
1823 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4