Core i9-10900KF vs i7-12700
Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-12700 is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the i7-12700 gets 698.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.2 times faster than the i7-12700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the i7-12700 gets 698.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 1.2 times faster than the i7-12700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
90672
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
10/20
12/20
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
25600 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
104.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
698.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
48.39k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
26.92k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
13.37k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
15.34k (x0.98)
TOTAL
90.37k
104.01k (x1.15)
Multithread
i9-10900KF
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
415.67k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
158.57k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
109.37k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
14.72k (x1.2)
TOTAL
825.47k
698.34k (x0.85)
Performance/W
i9-10900KF
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
6395 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
2440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
1683 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
226 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
10744 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
9876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
5493 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
2728 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
3131 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
21227 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4