| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900KF vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900KF gets a score of 825.5 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 3.9 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
10/20
4/8
TDP
125 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
90.37k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
825.47k points
210.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900KF
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
35.87k
22.97k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
31.43k
21.61k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.34k
8.99k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.73k
8.52k (x0.54)
TOTAL
90.37k
62.1k (x0.69)

Multithread

i9-10900KF

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
377.56k
82.75k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
347.59k
86.58k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.08k
29.34k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.24k
11.72k (x0.96)
TOTAL
825.47k
210.4k (x0.25)

Performance/W
i9-10900KF
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3020 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2781 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
705 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900KF
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6898 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6044 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1411 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3025 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
17378 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4