Core i9-10900K vs i7-9700F
Description
The i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 608.8 k points while the i7-9700F gets 269.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 2.3 times faster than the i7-9700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 608.8 k points while the i7-9700F gets 269.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 2.3 times faster than the i7-9700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
10/20
8/8
TDP
125 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
80.41k points
60.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.65k points
269.85k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10900K
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
19.5k
16.8k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
28.01k
24.08k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.45k
6.06k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.82k
13.98k (x0.88)
TOTAL
70.79k
60.93k (x0.86)
Multithread
i9-10900K
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
194.49k
92.79k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
312.59k
135.13k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.14k
33.29k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.58k
8.64k (x0.69)
TOTAL
608.81k
269.85k (x0.44)
Performance/W
i9-10900K
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
1556 points/W
1428 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2501 points/W
2079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
512 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
4870 points/W
4152 points/W
Performance/GHz
i9-10900K
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3751 points/GHz
3575 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5387 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1433 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3043 points/GHz
2975 points/GHz
TOTAL
13614 points/GHz
12964 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4