| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900K vs i7-6700K


Description
The i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-6700K is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the i7-6700K gets 254.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 2.7 times faster than the i7-6700K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
506e3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
10/20
4/8
TDP
125 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
80.41k points
63.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.65k points
254.56k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10900K
i7-6700K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.5k
14.73k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
28.01k
21.27k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.45k
5.52k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.82k
6.32k (x0.4)
TOTAL
70.79k
47.84k (x0.68)

Multithread

i9-10900K

i7-6700K
Test#1 (Integers)
194.49k
61.09k (x0.31)
Test#2 (FP)
312.59k
99.17k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.14k
26.57k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.58k
10.26k (x0.82)
TOTAL
608.81k
197.09k (x0.32)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900K
i7-6700K
Test#1 (Integers)
32.67k
25.78k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
28.49k
23.08k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.53k
5.32k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.72k
9.03k (x0.71)
TOTAL
80.41k
63.22k (x0.79)

Multithread

i9-10900K

i7-6700K
Test#1 (Integers)
307.39k
112.83k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
298.47k
106.86k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.94k
25.76k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
9.12k (x1.33)
TOTAL
685.65k
254.56k (x0.37)

Performance/W
i9-10900K
i7-6700K
Test#1 (Integers)
2459 points/W
1188 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
1125 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
5485 points/W
2680 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900K
i7-6700K
Test#1 (Integers)
6282 points/GHz
6139 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5479 points/GHz
5495 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2445 points/GHz
2150 points/GHz
TOTAL
15463 points/GHz
15052 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4