| | | | | | |

Core i9-10900K vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10900K gets a score of 685.6 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 4 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
10/20
4/8
TDP
125 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
10x32+10x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
10x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
80.41k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
685.65k points
171.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i9-10900K
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
19.5k
12.89k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
28.01k
18.55k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.45k
9.93k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.82k
9.54k (x0.6)
TOTAL
70.79k
50.91k (x0.72)

Multithread

i9-10900K

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
194.49k
50.06k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
312.59k
66.1k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
89.14k
20.24k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.58k
5.51k (x0.44)
TOTAL
608.81k
141.91k (x0.23)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10900K
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
32.67k
21.5k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
28.49k
17.71k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.53k
7.92k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.72k
8.24k (x0.65)
TOTAL
80.41k
55.37k (x0.69)

Multithread

i9-10900K

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
307.39k
73.03k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
298.47k
68.19k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.94k
24.89k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
5.54k (x0.81)
TOTAL
685.65k
171.65k (x0.25)

Performance/W
i9-10900K
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2459 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2388 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
55 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
5485 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10900K
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6282 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5479 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1257 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2445 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
15463 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4