| | | | | | |

Core i7-720QM vs Pentium E5500


Description
The i7-720QM is based on Nehalem architecture while the E5500 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-720QM gets a score of 27.3 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-720QM is 1.3 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
1067a
Core
Clarksfield
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2009
April 2010
Mean monothread perf.
13.13k points
12.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.78k points
20.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-720QM
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.49k
2.56k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
3.4k
6.54k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.95k
2.76k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
0.91k (x0.44)
TOTAL
8.92k
12.77k (x1.43)

Multithread

i7-720QM

E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.23k
4.32k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
11.4k
10.8k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
4.7k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.51k
0.87k (x0.19)
TOTAL
27.32k
20.69k (x0.76)

Performance/W
i7-720QM
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
94 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
253 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
72 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
100 points/W
13 points/W
TOTAL
607 points/W
318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-720QM
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
533 points/GHz
914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1216 points/GHz
2335 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
696 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
742 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
3187 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4