Core i7-720QM vs Pentium E5200 (M0)
Description
The i7-720QM is based on Nehalem architecture while the E5200 (M0) is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-720QM gets a score of 38.8 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-720QM is 1.8 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-720QM gets a score of 38.8 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-720QM is 1.8 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
10676
Core
Clarksfield
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2009
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
13.13k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.78k points
22.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-720QM
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
5.49k
2.88k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
6.31k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.53k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
1.35k (x0.65)
TOTAL
13.13k
13.08k (x1)
Multithread
i7-720QM
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
15.06k
5.45k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
12.15k
11.5k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.18k
4.02k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
1.05k (x0.24)
TOTAL
38.78k
22.02k (x0.57)
Performance/W
i7-720QM
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
335 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
270 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
160 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
862 points/W
339 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-720QM
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1962 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1267 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
717 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
745 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
4691 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4