Core i7-720QM vs Pentium N5000
Description
The i7-720QM is based on Nehalem architecture while the N5000 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-720QM gets a score of 38.8 k points while the N5000 gets 54.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5000 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-720QM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-720QM gets a score of 38.8 k points while the N5000 gets 54.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N5000 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-720QM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
706a1
Core
Clarksfield
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2009
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
13.13k points
17.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.78k points
54.76k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-720QM
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
5.49k
5.12k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
7.66k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.79k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
1.7k (x0.82)
TOTAL
13.13k
17.27k (x1.31)
Multithread
i7-720QM
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
15.06k
17.56k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
12.15k
25.71k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.18k
9.45k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
2.05k (x0.47)
TOTAL
38.78k
54.76k (x1.41)
Performance/W
i7-720QM
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
335 points/W
2927 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
270 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
160 points/W
1574 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
341 points/W
TOTAL
862 points/W
9127 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-720QM
N5000
Test#1 (Integers)
1962 points/GHz
1895 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1267 points/GHz
2838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
717 points/GHz
1032 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
745 points/GHz
631 points/GHz
TOTAL
4691 points/GHz
6396 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4