| | | | | | |

Core i7-720QM vs Core 2 Duo T5800


Description
The i7-720QM is based on Nehalem architecture while the T5800 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-720QM gets a score of 38.8 k points while the T5800 gets 12.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-720QM is 3 times faster than the T5800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
6fd
Core
Clarksfield
Meron
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
PGA 478
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2009
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
13.13k points
7.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.78k points
12.91k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-720QM
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
1.49k
1.97k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
3.4k
1.98k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.95k
1.9k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
1.1k (x0.53)
TOTAL
8.92k
6.95k (x0.78)

Multithread

i7-720QM

T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
4.23k
3.71k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
11.4k
3.71k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
3.53k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.51k
1.24k (x0.28)
TOTAL
27.32k
12.2k (x0.45)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-720QM
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
5.49k
2.29k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
2.05k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
1.96k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
1.07k (x0.51)
TOTAL
13.13k
7.37k (x0.56)

Multithread

i7-720QM

T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
15.06k
4.28k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
12.15k
3.8k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.18k
3.59k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
1.23k (x0.28)
TOTAL
38.78k
12.91k (x0.33)

Performance/W
i7-720QM
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
335 points/W
122 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
270 points/W
108 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
160 points/W
103 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
862 points/W
369 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-720QM
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
1962 points/GHz
1145 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1267 points/GHz
1023 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
717 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
745 points/GHz
537 points/GHz
TOTAL
4691 points/GHz
3684 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4