| | | | | | |

Core i7-720QM vs i3-9100


Description
The i7-720QM is based on Nehalem architecture while the i3-9100 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-720QM gets a score of 38.8 k points while the i3-9100 gets 171.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100 is 4.4 times faster than the i7-720QM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
906eb
Core
Clarksfield
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2009
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
13.13k points
66.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.78k points
229.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-720QM
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
1.49k
4.3k (x2.88)
Test#2 (FP)
3.4k
17.79k (x5.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.95k
5.58k (x2.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
8.86k (x4.26)
TOTAL
8.92k
36.53k (x4.09)

Multithread

i7-720QM

i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
4.23k
15.99k (x3.78)
Test#2 (FP)
11.4k
66.31k (x5.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
20.75k (x2.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.51k
4.44k (x0.98)
TOTAL
27.32k
107.49k (x3.93)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-720QM
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
5.49k
15.53k (x2.83)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
22.21k (x6.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
5.79k (x2.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
8.31k (x3.98)
TOTAL
13.13k
51.84k (x3.95)

Multithread

i7-720QM

i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.06k
58.56k (x3.89)
Test#2 (FP)
12.15k
86.17k (x7.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.18k
22.4k (x3.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
4.55k (x1.04)
TOTAL
38.78k
171.69k (x4.43)

Performance/W
i7-720QM
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
335 points/W
901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
270 points/W
1326 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
160 points/W
345 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
70 points/W
TOTAL
862 points/W
2641 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-720QM
i3-9100
Test#1 (Integers)
1962 points/GHz
3698 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1267 points/GHz
5289 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
717 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
745 points/GHz
1978 points/GHz
TOTAL
4691 points/GHz
12343 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4