Core i7-720QM vs Celeron N5105
Description
The i7-720QM is based on Nehalem architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-720QM gets a score of 38.8 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.7 times faster than the i7-720QM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-720QM gets a score of 38.8 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N5105 is 1.7 times faster than the i7-720QM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
906c0
Core
Clarksfield
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2009
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
13.13k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.78k points
64.09k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-720QM
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
5.49k
9.83k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
9.74k (x2.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
3.65k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
3.88k (x1.86)
TOTAL
13.13k
27.1k (x2.06)
Multithread
i7-720QM
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.06k
25.04k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
12.15k
24.7k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.18k
9.29k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
5.06k (x1.15)
TOTAL
38.78k
64.09k (x1.65)
Performance/W
i7-720QM
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
335 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
270 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
160 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
862 points/W
6409 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-720QM
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1962 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1267 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
717 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
745 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
4691 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4