Core i7-720QM vs Celeron N3060
Description
The i7-720QM is based on Nehalem architecture while the N3060 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-720QM gets a score of 38.8 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-720QM is 2.9 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-720QM gets a score of 38.8 k points while the N3060 gets 13.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-720QM is 2.9 times faster than the N3060. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106e5
406c4
Core
Clarksfield
Braswell
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.48 GHz
Socket
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
45 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2009
January 2016
Mean monothread perf.
13.13k points
10.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.78k points
13.36k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-720QM
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
5.49k
4.68k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
2.74k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
1.83k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
0.9k (x0.43)
TOTAL
13.13k
10.15k (x0.77)
Multithread
i7-720QM
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
15.06k
6.31k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
12.15k
3.68k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.18k
2.46k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
0.91k (x0.21)
TOTAL
38.78k
13.36k (x0.34)
Performance/W
i7-720QM
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
335 points/W
1051 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
270 points/W
614 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
160 points/W
410 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
152 points/W
TOTAL
862 points/W
2227 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-720QM
N3060
Test#1 (Integers)
1962 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1267 points/GHz
1104 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
717 points/GHz
739 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
745 points/GHz
364 points/GHz
TOTAL
4691 points/GHz
4092 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4