| | | | | | |

Core i7-720QM vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
The i7-720QM is based on Nehalem architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-720QM gets a score of 38.8 k points while the 3500U gets 149.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500U is 3.8 times faster than the i7-720QM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106e5
810f81
Core
Clarksfield
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
988-pin micro-FCPGA8
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2009
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
13.13k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.78k points
140.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-720QM
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.49k
3.24k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
3.4k
13.16k (x3.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.95k
4.41k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
3.32k (x1.6)
TOTAL
8.92k
24.12k (x2.7)

Multithread

i7-720QM

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.23k
12.95k (x3.06)
Test#2 (FP)
11.4k
57.84k (x5.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.17k
21.05k (x2.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.51k
3.51k (x0.78)
TOTAL
27.32k
95.36k (x3.49)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-720QM
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.49k
11.98k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
3.55k
15.85k (x4.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
4.53k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.09k
3.29k (x1.58)
TOTAL
13.13k
35.65k (x2.71)

Multithread

i7-720QM

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.06k
48.28k (x3.21)
Test#2 (FP)
12.15k
74.19k (x6.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.18k
23.29k (x3.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.39k
3.47k (x0.79)
TOTAL
38.78k
149.23k (x3.85)

Performance/W
i7-720QM
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
335 points/W
3219 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
270 points/W
4946 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
160 points/W
1553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
98 points/W
231 points/W
TOTAL
862 points/W
9949 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-720QM
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1962 points/GHz
3238 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1267 points/GHz
4283 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
717 points/GHz
1224 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
745 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
TOTAL
4691 points/GHz
9634 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4