| | | | | | |

Core i7-640LM vs Pentium E5200 (M0)


Description
The i7-640LM is based on Westmere architecture while the E5200 (M0) is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-640LM gets a score of 31.7 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-640LM is 1.4 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
20655
10676
Core
Calpella
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1288
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
25 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2010
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
16.35k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.74k points
22.02k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-640LM
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
2.88k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
4.58k
6.31k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.73k
2.53k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
1.35k (x0.66)
TOTAL
16.35k
13.08k (x0.8)

Multithread

i7-640LM

E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
5.45k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
10.21k
11.5k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
4.02k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.37k
1.05k (x0.44)
TOTAL
31.74k
22.02k (x0.69)

Performance/W
i7-640LM
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
517 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
409 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
1269 points/W
339 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-640LM
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2627 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1024 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
762 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
6130 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4