Core i7-640LM vs i5-4210U
Description
The i7-640LM is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-640LM gets a score of 31.7 k points while the i5-4210U gets 45.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4210U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-640LM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-640LM gets a score of 31.7 k points while the i5-4210U gets 45.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4210U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-640LM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
40651
Core
Calpella
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1288
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
25 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2010
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
16.35k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.74k points
57.58k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-640LM
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
9.26k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
4.58k
8.2k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.73k
3.57k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
2.92k (x1.44)
TOTAL
16.35k
23.95k (x1.47)
Multithread
i7-640LM
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
17.53k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
10.21k
17.56k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
7.65k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.37k
2.49k (x1.05)
TOTAL
31.74k
45.22k (x1.42)
Performance/W
i7-640LM
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
517 points/W
1169 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
409 points/W
1171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
510 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
1269 points/W
3015 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-640LM
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2627 points/GHz
3429 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
3038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1024 points/GHz
1322 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
762 points/GHz
1083 points/GHz
TOTAL
6130 points/GHz
8872 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4