Core i7-640LM vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The i7-640LM is based on Westmere architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-640LM gets a score of 31.7 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 2.5 times faster than the i7-640LM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-640LM gets a score of 31.7 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 2.5 times faster than the i7-640LM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
100fa0
Core
Calpella
Thuban
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1288
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
25 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2010
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
16.35k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.74k points
80.19k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-640LM
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
5.17k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
4.58k
5.33k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.73k
2.76k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
3.51k (x1.73)
TOTAL
16.35k
16.77k (x1.03)
Multithread
i7-640LM
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
29.82k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
10.21k
30.79k (x3.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
15.88k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.37k
3.69k (x1.56)
TOTAL
31.74k
80.19k (x2.53)
Performance/W
i7-640LM
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
517 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
409 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
1269 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-640LM
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2627 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1024 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
762 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
6130 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4