Core i7-640LM vs A6 9210
Description
The i7-640LM is based on Westmere architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-640LM gets a score of 31.7 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-640LM is 1.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-640LM gets a score of 31.7 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-640LM is 1.3 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
670f00
Core
Calpella
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.133 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1288
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
25 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2010
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
16.35k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.74k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-640LM
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
7.01k
4.87k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
4.58k
10.38k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.73k
2.59k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
2.38k (x1.17)
TOTAL
16.35k
20.22k (x1.24)
Multithread
i7-640LM
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
7.41k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
10.21k
11.87k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
3.35k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.37k
2.6k (x1.1)
TOTAL
31.74k
25.23k (x0.8)
Performance/W
i7-640LM
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
517 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
409 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
249 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
95 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
1269 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-640LM
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
2627 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1718 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1024 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
762 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
6130 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4