| | | | | | |

Core i7-950 vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i7-950 is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-950 gets a score of 76.3 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 141.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.9 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
706e5
Core
Bloomfield
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2009
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
19.46k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.29k points
171.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-950
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
12.89k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
5.38k
18.55k (x3.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
9.93k (x3.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
9.54k (x3.22)
TOTAL
19.46k
50.91k (x2.62)

Multithread

i7-950

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
31.53k
50.06k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
24.16k
66.1k (x2.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.84k
20.24k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
5.51k (x1.16)
TOTAL
76.29k
141.91k (x1.86)

Performance/W
i7-950
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
243 points/W
3337 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
186 points/W
4407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122 points/W
1349 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
368 points/W
TOTAL
587 points/W
9461 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-950
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2403 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1614 points/GHz
5153 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
934 points/GHz
2759 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
888 points/GHz
2650 points/GHz
TOTAL
5839 points/GHz
14142 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4