Core i7-950 vs Celeron G1610T
Description
The i7-950 is based on Westmere architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-950 gets a score of 76.3 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-950 is 2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-950 gets a score of 76.3 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-950 is 2 times faster than the G1610T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
306a9
Core
Bloomfield
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
130 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2048 kB
Date
June 2009
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
19.46k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.29k points
38.59k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-950
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
7.87k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
5.38k
7.14k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
3.04k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
2.79k (x0.94)
TOTAL
19.46k
20.84k (x1.07)
Multithread
i7-950
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
31.53k
15.12k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
24.16k
14.05k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.84k
5.94k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
3.48k (x0.73)
TOTAL
76.29k
38.59k (x0.51)
Performance/W
i7-950
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
243 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
186 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
587 points/W
1103 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-950
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2403 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1614 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
934 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
888 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
5839 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4