Core i7-950 vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The i7-950 is based on Westmere architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-950 gets a score of 76.3 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-950 is 1.2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-950 gets a score of 76.3 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-950 is 1.2 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
810f10
Core
Bloomfield
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.066 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.333 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2009
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
19.46k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
76.29k points
71.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-950
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
11.67k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
5.38k
14.02k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
4.53k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.96k
2.93k (x0.99)
TOTAL
19.46k
33.14k (x1.7)
Multithread
i7-950
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
31.53k
20.49k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
24.16k
31.32k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.84k
9.99k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.75k
3.03k (x0.64)
TOTAL
76.29k
64.82k (x0.85)
Performance/W
i7-950
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
243 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
186 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122 points/W
666 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
587 points/W
4322 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-950
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2403 points/GHz
3433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1614 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
934 points/GHz
1331 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
888 points/GHz
861 points/GHz
TOTAL
5839 points/GHz
9748 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4