| | | | | | |

Core i7-930 vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i7-930 is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-930 gets a score of 69.4 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-930 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
706e5
Core
Bloomfield
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.067 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2010
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.58k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.39k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-930
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1.94k
4.05k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
4.38k
15.29k (x3.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.64k
9.04k (x3.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.41k
10.54k (x4.38)
TOTAL
11.37k
38.92k (x3.42)

Multithread

i7-930

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.3k
9.05k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
19.36k
33.88k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.43k
15.34k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.01k
6.74k (x3.35)
TOTAL
42.11k
65.01k (x1.54)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-930
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
7.07k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
4.82k
10.55k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.86k
5.27k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.62k
5.66k (x2.16)
TOTAL
17.58k
28.56k (x1.62)

Multithread

i7-930

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
28.09k
25.28k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
21.62k
37.48k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.83k
17.77k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
6.92k (x1.43)
TOTAL
69.39k
87.45k (x1.26)

Performance/W
i7-930
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
216 points/W
1685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
2499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114 points/W
1185 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
461 points/W
TOTAL
534 points/W
5830 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-930
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2372 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1571 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
933 points/GHz
1424 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
855 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
5732 points/GHz
7718 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4