Core i7-930 vs i3-3110M
Description
The i7-930 is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-930 gets a score of 69.4 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-930 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-930 gets a score of 69.4 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-930 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
306a9
Core
Bloomfield
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.067 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
130 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2010
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
17.58k points
17.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
69.39k points
33.81k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-930
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
6.66k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
4.82k
6.88k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.86k
2.68k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.62k
2.6k (x0.99)
TOTAL
17.58k
18.83k (x1.07)
Multithread
i7-930
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
28.09k
16.56k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
21.62k
11.7k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.83k
7.28k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
2.25k (x0.46)
TOTAL
69.39k
37.78k (x0.54)
Performance/W
i7-930
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
216 points/W
473 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
166 points/W
334 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
534 points/W
1080 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-930
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
2372 points/GHz
2776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1571 points/GHz
2868 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
933 points/GHz
1118 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
855 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
5732 points/GHz
7847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4