| | | | | | |

Core i7-920 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-920 gets a score of 47.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 3.9 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
406f1
Core
Bloomfield
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Nehalem Westmere
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.993 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
130 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
November 2008
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
16.33k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.2k points
237.83k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-920
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
2.6k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
4.43k
7.55k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.61k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
2.03k (x0.8)
TOTAL
11.68k
14.79k (x1.27)

Multithread

i7-920

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.71k
17.41k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
18.81k
75.46k (x4.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.76k
26.25k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
4.65k (x0.92)
TOTAL
45.34k
123.78k (x2.73)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-920
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.12k
8.22k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
4.76k
12.06k (x2.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
4.01k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
2.89k (x1.08)
TOTAL
16.33k
27.18k (x1.66)

Multithread

i7-920

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
61.34k (x3.19)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
90.21k (x6.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
26.2k (x3.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.92k
4.62k (x0.94)
TOTAL
47.2k
182.37k (x3.86)

Performance/W
i7-920
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
148 points/W
722 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
115 points/W
1061 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
363 points/W
2146 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-920
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2044 points/GHz
2739 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1591 points/GHz
4021 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/GHz
963 points/GHz
TOTAL
5457 points/GHz
9059 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4