| | | | | | |

Core i7-920 vs Pentium 4415U


Description
The i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere architecture while the 4415U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-920 gets a score of 47.2 k points while the 4415U gets 56.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 4415U is 1.2 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
806e9
Core
Bloomfield
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Nehalem Westmere
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.993 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2048 kB
Date
November 2008
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
16.33k points
27.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.2k points
56.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-920
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
2.34k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
4.43k
9.51k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3.05k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
2.59k (x1.02)
TOTAL
11.68k
17.49k (x1.5)

Multithread

i7-920

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.71k
4.71k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
18.81k
21.73k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.76k
7.35k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
2.43k (x0.48)
TOTAL
45.34k
36.22k (x0.8)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-920
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.12k
8.29k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
4.76k
11.82k (x2.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
3.09k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
4.18k (x1.57)
TOTAL
16.33k
27.39k (x1.68)

Multithread

i7-920

4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
17.24k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
27.4k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
7.44k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.92k
4.31k (x0.88)
TOTAL
47.2k
56.39k (x1.19)

Performance/W
i7-920
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
148 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
115 points/W
1827 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
496 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
363 points/W
3759 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-920
4415U
Test#1 (Integers)
2044 points/GHz
3605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1591 points/GHz
5140 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/GHz
1819 points/GHz
TOTAL
5457 points/GHz
11908 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4