| | | | | | |

Core i7-920 vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-920 gets a score of 47.2 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 141.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 3 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
706e5
Core
Bloomfield
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Nehalem Westmere
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.993 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2008
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.33k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.2k points
171.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-920
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
3.88k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
4.43k
14.98k (x3.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
9.7k (x3.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
8.6k (x3.4)
TOTAL
11.68k
37.15k (x3.18)

Multithread

i7-920

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
7.71k
14.61k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
18.81k
54.9k (x2.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.76k
27.58k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
5.04k (x1)
TOTAL
45.34k
102.13k (x2.25)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-920
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6.12k
12.89k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
4.76k
18.55k (x3.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
9.93k (x3.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
9.54k (x3.58)
TOTAL
16.33k
50.91k (x3.12)

Multithread

i7-920

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
50.06k (x2.6)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
66.1k (x4.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
20.24k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.92k
5.51k (x1.12)
TOTAL
47.2k
141.91k (x3.01)

Performance/W
i7-920
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
148 points/W
3337 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
115 points/W
4407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
1349 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
368 points/W
TOTAL
363 points/W
9461 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-920
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2044 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1591 points/GHz
5153 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/GHz
2759 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/GHz
2650 points/GHz
TOTAL
5457 points/GHz
14142 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4