Core i7-920 vs Celeron N4120
Description
The i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere architecture while the N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-920 gets a score of 47.2 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-920 is 1 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-920 gets a score of 47.2 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-920 is 1 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
706a8
Core
Bloomfield
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.993 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
130 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
November 2008
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.33k points
18.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.2k points
46.17k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-920
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
6.12k
5.94k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
4.76k
7.51k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
2.78k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
2.67k (x1)
TOTAL
16.33k
18.9k (x1.16)
Multithread
i7-920
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
15.02k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
19.77k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
7.71k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.92k
3.67k (x0.75)
TOTAL
47.2k
46.17k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i7-920
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
148 points/W
2503 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
115 points/W
3294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
1286 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
611 points/W
TOTAL
363 points/W
7694 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-920
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
2044 points/GHz
2286 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1591 points/GHz
2887 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/GHz
1069 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
TOTAL
5457 points/GHz
7271 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4