Core i7-920 vs Celeron J3455
Description
The i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere architecture while the J3455 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-920 gets a score of 47.2 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-920 gets a score of 47.2 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
106a5
506c9
Core
Bloomfield
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.993 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
130 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
November 2008
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
16.33k points
12.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.2k points
47.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-920
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
6.12k
6.02k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
4.76k
3.49k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
2.01k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
1.47k (x0.55)
TOTAL
16.33k
12.98k (x0.79)
Multithread
i7-920
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
23.7k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
13.75k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
7.8k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.92k
2.09k (x0.42)
TOTAL
47.2k
47.34k (x1)
Performance/W
i7-920
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
148 points/W
2370 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
115 points/W
1375 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
780 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
363 points/W
4734 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-920
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
2044 points/GHz
2619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1591 points/GHz
1517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/GHz
637 points/GHz
TOTAL
5457 points/GHz
5645 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4