| | | | | | |

Core i7-920 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-920 gets a score of 47.2 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 1.7 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
106a5
100fa0
Core
Bloomfield
Thuban
Architecture
Nehalem Westmere
Base frecuency
2.667 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.993 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1366
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
130 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2008
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
16.33k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.2k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-920
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
1.98k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
4.43k
4.57k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.57k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
3.51k (x1.39)
TOTAL
11.68k
12.64k (x1.08)

Multithread

i7-920

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.71k
11.86k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
18.81k
27.4k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.76k
15.39k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
3.46k (x0.68)
TOTAL
45.34k
58.11k (x1.28)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-920
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.12k
5.17k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
4.76k
5.33k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.78k
2.76k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.67k
3.51k (x1.32)
TOTAL
16.33k
16.77k (x1.03)

Multithread

i7-920

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
29.82k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
30.79k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.05k
15.88k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.92k
3.69k (x0.75)
TOTAL
47.2k
80.19k (x1.7)

Performance/W
i7-920
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
148 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
115 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
62 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
363 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-920
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2044 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1591 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
5457 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4